Which type of risk would be concerned with the outcome of a car accident resulting from a faulty product?

The correct answer, physical risk, pertains to the actual harm or danger that could arise from a product's malfunction or flaw, particularly in situations like a car accident caused by a faulty vehicle. When consumers consider the potential for injury to themselves or others due to a product's failure, they are evaluating the physical risk associated with using that product. In the context of a car accident, the implications of a faulty product extend beyond financial or functional aspects and directly relate to personal safety and well-being.

In contrast, psychosocial risk focuses on how a product might affect a consumer's social status or psychological well-being, which is less relevant in this scenario. Financial risk pertains to the monetary consequences of a product failing, such as repair costs or loss of investment, but does not encompass the potential for physical harm. Functional risk involves concerns about whether the product will perform as expected, which may lead to inconvenience or dissatisfaction, but again does not address the physical dangers associated with a malfunction that could result in an accident.